Who is Jo? How does she respond to her father’s story-telling?
Jo was the four year old girl whose full name was Joanne who was a daughter of Jack and Clare. When she was two years old she was used hear a story before going to sleep. Every time Jack was used to tell new story with a slight variations to the old one. Since she was grown up now and was intelligent and inquisitive child, her mind was bubbling with queries regarding whatever she heard or saw. She responded to her father’s tale according to her own perspective. The eagerness to understand and her restlessness made her ask a lot of questions, which sometimes lest her father in a dilemma. But when Jack was telling a tale about the isolation of Roger Skunk, here she promptly questioned about whether he would see the wise owl again. She wanted her father Jack to end the story according to her perspective. These facts tell that she was living in her own imaginary world.
The story is a satire on the conceit of those in power. How does the author employ the literary device of dramatic irony in the story?
What makes Jack feel caught in an uglymiddle position?
Why is an adult’s perspective on life different from that of a child’s?
Apparent illogicality sometimes turns out to be a futuristic projection? Discuss.
Do you think that the third level was a medium of escape for Charley? Why?
Do you see an intersection of time and space in the story?
How would you describe the behaviour of the Maharaja’s minions towards him? Do you find them truly sincere towards him or are they driven by fear when they obey him? Do we find a similarity in today’s political order?
What is the moral issue that the story raises?
There are moments in life when we have to make hard choices between our roles as private individuals and as citizens with a sense of national loyalty. Discuss with reference to the story you have just read.
What is the author’s indirect comment on subjecting innocent animals to the willfulness of human beings?
There are moments in life when we have to make hard choices between our roles as private individuals and as citizens with a sense of national loyalty. Discuss with reference to the story you have just read.
When Stephens comes back to the cell he jumps to a conclusion and the whole machinery blindly goes by his assumption without even checking the identity of the injured ‘McLeery’. Does this show how hasty conjectures can prevent one from seeing the obvious? How is the criminal able to predict such negligence?
What explains the attitude of the General in the matter of the enemy soldier? Was it human consideration, lack of national loyalty, dereliction of duty or simply self-absorption?
Did the Governor and his staff finally heave a sigh of relief?
Apparent illogicality sometimes turns out to be a futuristic projection? Discuss.
What is the moral issue that the story raises?
Philately helps keep the past alive. Discuss other ways in which this is done. What do you think of the human tendency to constantly move between the past, the present and the future?
‘Take care of the small things and the big things will take care of themselves.’ What is the relevance of this statement in the context of the Antarcticenvironment?
What will now happen to the astrologer? Do you think the prophecy was indisputably disproved?
What is the author’s indirect comment on subjecting innocent animals to the willfulness of human beings?