Question 7

Kerala, with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking
than Haryana. Hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should
not be used to compare states. Do you agree? Discuss.

Answer

 The Per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and comparison of states not based on it due to reasons as mentioned below : All the goods and services cannot be bought by money that we need for well being. Income is not a adequate indicator of material goods and services that are used by the citizens. Pollution-free environment in a colony cannot be maintained between rich people unless preventive steps are taken by the whole community. Sometimes, collective services like security is better for the whole locality than the security for one’s own house. Again opening of a school for the children of the whole community than for one or two children of a rich person. Human development ranking in Kerela is better than Punjab. Infant Mortality Rate is 11 in Kerela while 49 in Punjab, whereas the per capita income is much more in punjab than Kerala. It is 26000 in Punjab whereas it is 22800 in Kerala. It is because  Kerala has adequate basic health and educational facilities.Similarly in some states, the functioning of Public Distribution System  (PDS)is smooth and ration is given regularly to the people whereas in some states the functioning of ration shops is not proper. At such places, a shortage of grains faced by people that affect their health. Thus it is clear that the comparison of states should not be made on the basis of per capita income.

Recently Viewed Questions of Class 10 Social Science - Understanding Economic Development

Write a Comment: