How did ordinary people view Partition?
For ordinary people, partition was full of challenges and brought sufferings. The division was not a territorial division for them. It was also not a party politics of Congress and the Muslim League for them. But for the ordinary people, partition was a challenge for them. It brought misery and troubles to them. It meant death of their loved one, loss of property and wealth. Partition also uprooted them from their paternal land. People were forced to live in refugee camps. They were also forced to start their life once again from a new platform. So for ordinary people, partition was not a pleasant experience, but it was painful and full of sufferings.
What are the problems of using official sources in writing about the history of peasants?
How did the Paharias respond to the coming of outsiders?
Why was the jotedar a powerful figure in many areas of rural Bengal?
What were the concerns that influenced town planning in the nineteenth century?
Why was the charkha chosen as a symbol of nationalism?
What do visual representations tell us about the revolt of 1857? How do historians analyse these representations?
How did the American Civil War affect the lives of ryots in India?
How did women experience Partition?
In what way was the livelihood of the Paharias different from that of the Santhals?
Why was the revolt particularly widespread in Awadh? What prompted the peasants, taluqdars and zamindars to join the revolt?
What did the Muslim League demand through its resolution of 1940?
Why were many zamindaris auctioned after the Permanent Settlement?
How did the Constituent Assembly seek to resolve the language controversy?
What explains the anger of the Deccan ryots against Fig. 10.20 the moneylenders?
How was the term minority defined by different groups?
Why did some people think of Partition as a very sudden development?
How did the Paharias respond to the coming of outsiders?
Why did Mahatma Gandhi think Hindustani should be the national language?
Discuss the evidence that indicates planning and coordination on the part of the rebels.
What do visual representations tell us about the revolt of 1857? How do historians analyse these representations?